Brute Force Attacks: Password Security & Protection
If you’ve ever wondered why security professionals bang on about password length and complexity like a broken record, you’re about to find out. We’re about to break down the maths, the myths, and the mayhem behind brute force attacks-and why your dog’s name with a “1” at the end isn’t going to cut it.
The Maths Behind Brute Force
Brute force attacks are as subtle as a sledgehammer. The attacker tries every combination until they stumble upon the right one. It’s not clever, but with enough time and computing power, it works. The only thing standing between your data and a determined attacker is the sheer number of combinations.
The Formula
Here’s the magic formula:
Possible Combinations=(Character Set Size)Password Length
If maths isn’t your thing, don’t worry. Let’s break it down:
- A 6-character password using only lowercase letters (a-z) gives you 266=308,915,776 possible combinations.
- Bump that up to 8 characters, and you’re looking at 268=208,827,064,576 combinations.
Now, if you add uppercase letters, numbers, and symbols, the character set explodes. Suddenly, the attacker’s job gets a lot harder. But how much harder? Let’s see.
Password Complexity: Small Changes, Massive Impact
Here’s a table that shows how quickly things get out of hand for attackers:
Scenario | Password Length | Character Set | Possible Combinations |
Short and Simple | 6 | Lowercase letters (a-z) | 266=308,915,776 |
Longer but Still Simple | 8 | Lowercase letters (a-z) | 268=208,827,064,576 |
Adding Complexity | 8 | Lowercase + Uppercase (a-z, A-Z) | 528=53,459,728,531,456 |
Maximum Complexity | 12 | All letters, numbers, symbols (94) | 9412=475,920,493,781,698,549,504 |
Notice the jump? Add just a couple of characters or broaden the character set, and suddenly, attackers need to check trillions more possibilities. That’s the difference between “cracked in seconds” and “cracked when humans colonise Mars.”
The Power Problem: It’s Not Just About the Numbers
But before you pop the champagne, there’s a catch. The time it takes to brute-force a password isn’t just about the number of combinations. It’s also about how many guesses an attacker can make per second. Enter the hardware arms race.
Basic Computer vs. Supercomputer
Let’s compare:
- Basic Computer: 1 million guesses per second. That’s quick for simple passwords, but for anything complex, it’s like trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon. Cracking an 8-character password with letters and digits? About 6.92 years.
- Supercomputer: 1 trillion guesses per second. Suddenly, those simple passwords crumble in seconds. But even with this firepower, a 12-character password with all ASCII characters would still take around 15,000 years to crack.
The takeaway is that password length and complexity buy you time, lots of it. Time that attackers don’t have.
Exponential Growth: Why Every Character Counts
Let’s visualise this. Imagine you’re at a buffet (because who doesn’t love a buffet?). If you’ve only got three dishes to choose from, you’ll run out of combinations quickly. But if the buffet has 94 dishes (lowercase, uppercase, numbers, symbols), and you’re allowed 12 trips, the number of meal combinations becomes astronomical. That’s what happens with passwords. Every extra character and character type makes the attacker’s job exponentially harder.
Real-World Brute Force: Cracking the PIN
Let’s put theory aside and work through a practical example. Suppose you’re up against a system that uses a 4-digit PIN. The system generates a random PIN and checks your guess through a web endpoint. If you get it right, you get a flag (and some bragging rights).
The Python Script
Here’s a simple Python script to brute-force the PIN:
import requests
ip = “127.0.0.1” # Change this to your instance IP address
port = 1234 # Change this to your instance port number
for pin in range(10000):
formatted_pin = f”{pin:04d}” # Pads with zeros (e.g., 7 becomes “0007”)
print(f”Attempted PIN: {formatted_pin}”)
response = requests.get(f”http://{ip}:{port}/pin?pin={formatted_pin}”)
if response.ok and ‘flag’ in response.json():
print(f”Correct PIN found: {formatted_pin}”)
print(f”Flag: {response.json()[’flag’]}”)
break
What’s happening here? The script tries every possible 4-digit PIN (from 0000 to 9999), sending each one to the server. When it gets a hit, it prints the correct PIN and the flag. Simple, effective, and a perfect demonstration of why short PINs are about as secure as a chocolate teapot.
Watching the Attack Unfold
Run the script, and you’ll see a stream of attempted PINs:
text
Attempted PIN: 4039
Attempted PIN: 4040
...
Correct PIN found: 4053
Flag: {...}
It’s not glamorous, but it works. And if the system doesn’t slow you down, you can try all 10,000 combinations in a matter of minutes. That’s why banks and other security-conscious organisations limit the number of attempts and lock accounts after a few wrong guesses.
Why Brute Force Still Works
You’d think in 2025 we’d have moved past brute force attacks, but you’d be surprised how many systems still rely on weak passwords and PINs. Attackers love easy opportunities, and there’s plenty of it.
Common Mistakes That Make Brute Force Easy
- Short Passwords: Anything under 8 characters is asking for trouble.
- Limited Character Sets: Only using lowercase letters or digits? You’re making the attacker’s job easy.
- No Rate Limiting: If a system lets you try unlimited guesses, it’s basically inviting brute force attacks.
- No Account Lockout: If users can keep guessing forever, attackers will eventually get lucky.
Defending Against Brute Force
So, what can you do to protect yourself (and your users) from brute force attacks? Here’s a checklist:
- Use Long, Complex Passwords: Aim for at least 12 characters, mixing uppercase, lowercase, numbers, and symbols.
- Implement Rate Limiting: Slow down repeated guesses. Make attackers’ lives miserable.
- Account Lockout Policies: Lock accounts after a certain number of failed attempts. Yes, it can be annoying for users, but it’s a necessary evil.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Even if attackers guess the password, they’ll need a second factor to get in.
- Educate Users: Remind them why “password” or “123456” are terrible choices.
- Monitor for Suspicious Activity: Set up alerts for repeated failed logins.
Why We Still Get It Wrong
The truth is, laziness is a common human trait. We want passwords we can remember, so we use our pet’s name, our birthday, or the word “password.” Attackers know this, and they exploit it. That’s why brute force attacks, dictionary attacks, and credential stuffing are still so effective.
However, the upside is that you can make things considerably more difficult for attackers with a bit of work. Use a password manager. Turn on MFA. Don’t reuse passwords. Yes, it’s boring advice, but it works.
Make Brute Force Impractical
Brute force attacks aren’t going away. As long as there are weak passwords and systems that allow unlimited guesses, attackers will keep swinging that sledgehammer. But you don’t have to make it easy for them.
- Length matters.
- Complexity matters.
- Defensive controls matter.
Using your pet’s name as a password is risky; it’s easily discovered by online attackers. They care about how quickly they can guess your password. Don’t make it easy for them.
Security Isn’t Just About Tech
Security isn’t just about firewalls and encryption. It’s about making smart choices-like using strong passwords and limiting brute force attempts. Technology will keep developing, but the basics remain the same.
If you take nothing else away from this, let it be this: your password is the gatekeeper to your digital life. Make it strong, make it unique, and make attackers wish they’d chosen a different target.
Now, go call your parents. They probably miss you. And while you’re at it, tell them to stop using “password123” too.
For more insightful and engaging write-ups, visit kosokoking.com and stay ahead in the world of cybersecurity!